Ban on Candidate Contribution Sticks
It is imperative to mention that the courts have chosen to stick to the ban imposed on contribution of unlimited funds to political campaigns. You will realize that around 90% of Americans prefer having the role of money in politics to be put under control. This is what has made so many people to eagerly wait for the ruling so as to know what role the corporates will take in financing politics in future. The decision taken up by the Supreme Court will without a doubt bot go well with so many people. They declined to overturn the ban on campaign finance. You will get to understand more about this particular ruling as you keep on reading.
You need to keep in mind that there was basically nothing strange that happened in the court today. The Supreme Court just chose to go by what the previous ruling on the campaign finance laws was without considering its challenges. This means that corporates will not be allowed to donate any money to both campaigns and candidates. It is through this decision that the role of corporates in the political arena is being tamed. You will find that in previous instances, corporates has the room to donate to campaign kitties from time to time. This would often be allowed if the money is not tied to a particular individual. It is imperative to mention that this case was actually presented by two companies that hail from Massachusetts. This case was purposed to enhance financial responsibility and even economic opportunities. It is recommended for you to consider a good lawyer whenever presenting such a case.
You need to be made conversant with the legal arguments that this case was premised on. You will find that these companies argued that the first amendment rights of companies was barely being observed. The argument was that political donations were actually part of freedom of speech. They also invoked the constitution which seeks to protect every individual equally. While at it, non-profit and even charity organizations are not allowed to donate to these campaigns. This means that they are treated differently from corporate entities. This does conflict what the constitution basically stands for.
It is necessary to mention that the ruling of the High Court was upheld. This ruling indicated that corporates are not given the room to contribute to political campaigns. This is brought about by the ease of causing corruption in politics. This means that all political candidates will be forbidden from accepting such donations from various corporations.